The firm’s quality assurance was limited to manually reviewing a small, random selection of call recordings. This reactive approach presented several significant obstacles:
Delayed and Subjective Insights: Manual reviews occurred days after the calls took place, making timely agent feedback impossible. Furthermore, assessments were prone to individual interpretation, leading to inconsistent coaching.
Missing the Narrative Arc: A call that started with a frustrated customer might end with a successful resolution. The firm had no way to track this evolution of sentiment, meaning they couldn't identify which agents were skilled at de-escalation and turning a negative experience around.
Inability to Identify Best Practices: Without granular analysis, it was difficult to pinpoint the specific phrases, explanations, or techniques that consistently led to positive outcomes. Top-performing agent skills remained anecdotal rather than scalable training points.
Reactive Problem Solving: By the time a manager reviewed a call where a customer was clearly upset, the opportunity to intervene or salvage the relationship was long gone.[1]